Document Type : Review Paper


Architecture Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq


                   Architecture as a human production is considered as the principal source of distinguished elements within the city; such elements give the city its own identity. The progress of achieving such unique pieces is regarded as an urban design strategy which requires a particular methodology, depending not only on the designer but also on the perception of these elements. This paper concentrates on exploring the most important perceptual mechanisms that affect the recipient in making him distinguish the unique elements-particularly building- within an urban context. The study is spatially limited to the city of Mosul.
The problem of the current study is constituted in the lack of a comprehensive vision about the mechanisms affecting the direction of the recipient to realize the unique output, so that the designer can follow clear mechanisms to reach the realization of a unique building within its context.
This study aims to explore the mechanisms of guiding the recipient to realize uniqueness and the steps involved, within the different design practices, that affect obtaining a unique building. To achieve this goal, the research is defined by building the theoretical framework represented by the mechanisms of guiding the recipient to realize uniqueness, which includes two secondary axes: the first is the mechanisms of realizing uniqueness at the personal level of the recipient, and the second is the effectiveness of perceiving uniqueness at the level of urban structure.
The practical side of the study is conducted in two parts; The first is to nominate a number of unique local products based on the mental image of the users of that urban environment, and the second includes the application of the learned mechanisms to a number of unique local architectural products according to the mechanisms of guiding the recipient to realize the uniqueness.
The results show a great variation in the mechanisms that affect the realization of the unique building, which include the effectiveness of attracting attention, the element of surprise and mystery, the privacy of the building site, the available field of view and stimulation of the property of perception, and the size of the building in terms of distinguishing its height or size in its context, contrast with the background, through the type, color and properties of packaging materials that affect the realization of the unique building.
The study concluded that there is a significant role for the perception mechanisms followed by the recipient in achieving the uniqueness of the architectural production, as variables that contribute to the visual assessment of the output among users of the urban environment. These mechanisms vary in the extent of their impact on directing the perception of the recipient, in addition to the possibility of the influence of more than one mechanism in achieving the uniqueness of the same production within the urban context.


Main Subjects

[1]     F. D. K. Ching, Architecture: Form, space, and order, John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
[2]     A. Rossi, “The Architecture of the City,” MIT press, 1984.
[3]     N. Ayıran, “The role of metaphors in the formation of architectural Identity,” 2012
[4]     S. Sebastian, R. Shankar, and S. Al Qeisi, “Design Approach of Zaha Hadid Form Vocabularies and Design Techniques,” June, 2018.
[5]     G. Çizgen, “Rethinking the Role of Context and Contextualism in Architecture and Design,” Eastern Mediterranean University (EMU), 2012.
[6]     K. Lynch, The Image of The City, Cambridge, Mass: Mit Press, 1977.
[7]     H. Mahdi, “Iconic architecture and sustainability as a tool to attract the global attention,” vol. 518., 2019.
[8]     A. A. Hamza and B. M. Khdim, “The Impact of Mythology on the Semantic Construction of Contemporary Architecture,” The Iraqi Journal of Architecture and Planning, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 72–83, Apr. 2015.
[9]     A. Salih, “The Architectural Phenomenon and the Creative Product of the 10th Century Architecture Globally - The Dwelling as a Model,” ASSOC ARAUNIV J ENG SCI, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 145-161, Aug. 2019.
[10]  D. I. J. K. Al-Yousif, "The Problem of Reception for the Designer and the Recipient in Architecture," The Iraqi Journal of Architecture and Planning, vol. 7, no. 14, pp. 48–61, 2008.
[11]  Y. F. Al-Wafa’i, “An Analytical Study of the Characteristics of Iconic Buildings,” Master Thesis, College of Engineering, Department of Architectural Design, Syrian Arab Republic, Damascus, 2018.
[12]  X. Yongliang, “On the Protection of Unique Modern architecture in China,” IRA-International Journal of Management & Social Sciences (ISSN 2455-2267), vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 137–141, 2019.
[13]  H. Cao, J. Feng, Y. Li, and V. Kostakos, “Uniqueness in the City: Urban Morphology and Location Privacy,” Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–20, 2018.
[14]  M. Skaza, ”Architecture as a Consequence of Perception,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 471, 2019, p. 022033.
[15]  K. Elhagla, D. M. Nassar, and M. A. Ragheb, “Iconic buildings’ contribution toward urbanism,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 803–813, 2020.
[16]  I. Al-Yousif, “Consumption in Architecture, A Study of Formulas for Dealing with Consumption in Local Architecture,” The Iraqi Journal for Architectural Engineering, Oct 2012.
[17]   N. Al-Qaysi, “The Impact of the Formal and Organizational Characteristics of the Production in Its Aesthetic Appraisal - According to the Specificity of Iraqi Academic Practice,” The Iraqi Journal of Architecture and Planning, vol. 8, no. 16, pp. 83–103, 2009.
[18]  SFMOMA, “The Story of the New Visual Identity,” [Online]. Available:
[19]  ArchDaily. (2016, May. 04). “SFMOMA Expansion / Snøhetta,” [Online]. Available: